Please feel free to comment on your thoughts from this article in the 1970's. Ideas you agree with or disagree...
YOU MEAN A RABBIT CAN BE TAUGHT TO FLY?
As an individual you must not be satisfied with just becoming like everybody else.
By Leo Buscaglia, Ph.D.
Busscaglia: "I teach seminars in graduate school. It's amazing how people have learned to parrot by then."
A rabbit, bird, fish, squirrel, duck and so on, all decided to start a school. The rabbit insisted that running had to be in the curriculum. The bird insisted that flying be in the curriculum. The fish insisted that swimming be in the curriculum. The squirrel insisted that perpendicular trees climbing be in the curriculum.
All the other animals wanted their specialty to be in the curriculum, too, so they put everything in and then made the glorious mistake of insisting that all the animals take all of the courses. The rabbit was magnificent in running; nobody could run like the rabbit. But they insisted that it was good intellectual and emotional discipline to teach the rabbit flying. So they insisted that the rabbit learned to fly and they put her on this branch and said, "Fly, rabbit!" And the poor old thing jumped off, broke her leg and fractured her skull. She became brain-damaged and then she couldn't run very well, either.
The same way with the bird -- she could fly like a freak all over the place, do loops and loops, and she was making an A. But they insisted that this bird burrow holes in the ground like a gopher. Of course she broke her wings and everything else, and then she couldn't fly.
We know this is wrong, yet nobody does anything about it. You may be a genius. You may be one of the greatest writers in the world, but you can't get into a university unless you can pass trigonometry. For what? Look at the list of drop outs: William Faulkner, John F. Kennedy, Thomas Edison. They couldn't face school. "I don't want to learn perpendicular tree climbing. I'm never going to climb perpendicularly. I'm a bird. I can fly to the top of the tree without having to do that."
"Never mind, it's good discipline."
As an individual, you must not be satisfied with just becoming like everybody else. You must think for yourself. For example, art supervisors. I can remember when they used to come to my classroom in elementary school, and I'm sure you can remember it, too. You were given a paper, and the teacher would put up the drawing in front of you and you were really excited. It was going to be art time. You had all the crayolas in front of you, and you folded your hands and you waited. And soon the art teacher would come running in, because she had been to fourteen other classrooms that day teaching art. She ran in, and she'd huff and puff and she'd say, "Good morning girls and boys. Today we are going to draw a tree." And all the kids would say, "Goody, we're going to draw a tree!" And then she'd get up there with a green crayola and she'd draw this great big green thing. And then she put a brown base on it and a few blades of grass. And she'd say, "There is a tree." And all the kids would look at it and they'd say, "That isn't a tree. That's a lollipop." But she said that was a tree, and then she's pass out these papers and say, "Now, draw a tree." She didn't really say, "Draw a tree" -- she said, "Draw my tree." And the sooner you found out that's what she meant and could reproduce this lollipop and hand it to her, the sooner you would get an A.
But here was little Janie who knew that wasn't a tree, because she'd seen a tree such as this art teacher had never experienced! So she got magenta, and orange, and blue, and purple, and green, and she scribbled all over her page and happily brought it up and gave it to the teacher. She looked at it and said, "Oh my God...."
How long does it take somebody to realize that what they're really saying is, "To pass, I want you to reproduce my tree." And so it goes through the first grade, second, third and right on into seminars in graduate school. I teach seminars in graduate school. It's amazing how people have learned to parrot by then. Think? Don't be ridiculous. They can give you the facts, verbatim, just as you've given it to them. And you can't blame those students, because that's what they've been taught. You say to them, "Be creative," and they're fearful. And so what happens to our uniqueness; what happens to our tree? All this beautiful uniqueness has gone right down the drain. Everybody is like everybody else, and everybody is happy. R.D. Laing says, "we are satisfied when we've made people like ourselves out of our children.
Excerpted from the book, LIVING, LOVING & LEARNING by Leo Buscaglia
A very interesting analogy, but very true. We try to stuff our kids full of all this general stuff that truly has no relevance to them at all. All of us have been the bird who had no interest in anything but flying, or the rabbit who only wanted to run. So why do we give them learning experiences that truly have no meaning to them? I understand that we want to give them a variety of learning experiences through late grade schools. My husband is a principal of a public International Baccalaureate (IB)school who has all of their children take the cores, PE, Technology, World Language, Art, and Music to develop the whole child. But when they reach high school, why can't we let our rabbit's run and birds fly? Why can't we create our curriculum and our high learning standards to fit student's needs? Don't we do this with our student's with IEP's? Why can't we do it for all? For example: I am a student who truly loves cars. Why can't a teacher and a student sit down and create an educational plan that fits that specific student. The teacher knows what kind of standards are needed in the all the areas, so why not develop a collaborative plan to meet both the school's and the student's goals? This requires us to have a very different outlook on what "school" is. This requires teachers to truly engage kids at their level and their interests, something that really doesn't happen for most of our student population (the rabbits and the birds...).
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with Buscaglia. Creativity must be not only be encouraged, but praised. There is no easier place to do this than in the elementary classroom. Children have such a unique perspective of the world. We have all heard the saying "through the eyes of a child." I am an amateur photographer and I am always trying to look at objects at different viewpoints. It is vital that we transfer this way of thinking to other areas as well. As a teacher, I think it is important to teach and encourage creativity in students just like we teach various problem solving skills. This can be done in any subject area. For example, take a well know children’s story and let the children get silly by changing the characters, setting, or dialog. Just a little direction and they can take you on a wild journey.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the author for the most part but I also feel that he might be oversimplifying the situation. I think that it is our job as educators to help students recognize their strengths and encourage them to develop their strengths. However, another important part of our job is to expose them to areas outside of their comfort zone. Even though I was never very good at art and did not enjoy public speaking I benefitted from taking art classes and giving presentations in elementary and secondary school. If art and music classes were not required courses I never would have taken these classes. I think the key is to take the student’s strengths and areas where they struggle and mesh them when possible. I strongly agree with the author position that educators can discourage creativity by rewarding the students who parrot their beliefs and viewpoints and do not encourage the students to think for themselves. One of the most important aspects in creating a positive classroom culture is to develop an environment where students feel safe to express themselves.
ReplyDelete